The cold
of Chicago began to feel painful little by little. I started running every morning to avoid the cold, and that gave
me a good feeling, and the best of my routine was that occasionally, I was accompanied by some children, and
parents felt confidence letting them run with me, should not teachers motivate
children?.

During a
particularly cold morning, I began a mental debate that I dared to share with
Gaby: why should children go to school even in the most deplorable conditions?.
Why could not they learn at home?, Why
do we have to expose children to diseases?.
The first Gaby’s
idea was to tell me that there was a movement called Home Schooling in some countries which is stronger under various
arguments included distances, the cost of schools, diseases, and especially an
increment of school violence that find more and more victims, this option also
allows parents to control content to which their children are exposed with.
That day I
thought much on this topic, around the second week of cold season, 12 children were
reported sick and, of course, the rest were at risk. We started eating more fruit than ever and learned to
wash our hands with soap and water, because there are health statistics
indicating this simple process reduces the risk of contagion.
Children
came to school with tired faces after
having received the usual vaccines, but certainly with encouragement to learn,
to share ideas and they never were tired of smiling to the challenges. Those were the kind of children
that doesn’t appear in the books.
When I
left school, I decided to visit my guru, she had been traveling, so I missed
our afternoon sharing a cup of tea with a slice of pumpkin bread, I don't
understand why she likes so much the pumkin bread, but I am always sure we can
have it in return for our talks that always left me something interesting in
the head.
This time
I asked her the same question I made to Gaby: why children can not stay home to
learn?.
I think she
looked at me with weirdness, and I thought she was trying to get into my brain
through my eyes, but after a brief silence, that I have learned she needs because
that means her answer is being designed to teach something, she said:
- I think that I can
give you two answers, both independent, but maybe thinking a little in each one
we can discover that there are more possible reasons.
The first answer
is that if all children could rest when the weather is extreme, the cost of
teachers and administrative services would be such that probably education would
become untenable in a short time. Any region has changes in temperature that
range from moderate to strong, but at different times, which it would create a distinct school calendar... I think
it would be a little chaotic and little viable for these reason.
The second
answer is less simple but is related to the idea of education. Humans are the
only one specie that puts its creatures for years and years in artificial
environments to learn, or at least, what a group of people believes that they
must learn. Ideas, plans and programmes, I call to all that education, and it’s
far from learning, since many times these ideas are outside the children context.
But then,
what is the relationship between learning and education?, Are we educating
children to learn?.
-
In theory, Yes, but I think there is a huge
distance between this two concepts. When someone designs a plan, it does it
thinking about what it should be learned and what this person thinks that
children should know and how should they know it, but there is a gap between
what that person believes that children should know and when children can use
that knowledge.
All of us believe children should speak, write, read and learn numbers,
because they are the basic learning and it is assumed that children should
maximize these cognitive tools. But what if a child is delayed?, you don't stop
and analyze why a child does or doesn´t learn. Your program says that you must
follow a schedule and if a child can¡t follow the routine, parents should seek
either external or school support to help that child to catch up with the rest
of the classmates. The problem is student, not the school system.
Education
is a set of ideas, which are designes to be released through teachers, who are
the depositaries of them, and they manage then in a such of way that children
learn them, from teaching strategies, so teachers are another distinct entity, although
of course, they are part of the education.
Learning
is a process that occurs inside children’s brains, as a response to stimuli
from the environment, which is shared with the rest of the species on Earth in
order to survive.
The rest
of the species do not cease to learn, by cold or heat, right?, so perhaps we should
not complain.
-I guess
that the rest of the species have other things to complain, because considerating
their exams are about showing the ability to survive and if they do not pass
the test, the cost issimply their life.
I think
then that I see things from a different perspective now. I guess that pushing
children to study allows us to have better drugs against diseases that allow
them to go to school.
-I've seen
your kids more than happy running with you to school. I think you make a huge
difference. You push them learn!.
When I got
back home that evening, I got a great blend of fruits and vegetables, even I added
spinach (even though I think they are disgusting) to strengthen my immune
system and withstand the cold of Chicago. As Jose’s parents sa:, if we have to
live here, we can not complain, because it’s better to give a good face to life;
and I guess that everyone think the same
thing, because children who fell ill were crying to allow them to return to
school to learn... no doubt I was doing something weird with those children, I
was sure that parents will blame me for a children ideas attack!, what will
parents do if these kids decide to be scientists?.
No comments:
Post a Comment